Members Present

• Peggy Brown
• Elmer Turner
• Olga Andreyvska (Non-Voting)
• Ned Reich
• Carol Poh

Committe Discussion Points

• shrink sign to 110in from 118in to respect building facade and entrance
• birds nests with the open frame?
• sign looks accidental, was a projecting sign considered?
• entrance to building is too nice to cover up (windows), retro design to the glass block is a really interesting element that might need to be retained and not covered up
• lighting the entrance/doorway suggested to owners
• sign should not cover up glass block, make the sign "float" (suspend from the ceiling or sides) or possibly a verticle marquee sign or projecting sign used instead
• remove the brushed aluminum background and just use the infinity loop and suspend it from the top or the sides.
• thats why the original sign was up so high, to not take away from the full facade and glass blocks at entranceway
• suggests cleanings up brick work and glass to owners
• light up the glass block inplace of the led illuminating.

Motion to reject the sign to see if it can be restyled to an open, suspended sign due to the proposed mounting to preserve the entryway facade and use of the block windows for back lighting.

1st to make motion = Carol Poh

2nd the motion = Peggy Brown

Unanimous Vote